| Compass | Keller Williams | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2012 | 1983 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY | Austin, TX |
| Footprint | National — concentrated in major U.S. metros | National and international — one of the largest by agent count |
| Business model | Tech-forward traditional brokerage (agents, offices, W-2 support staff) | Franchise built around training, a commission cap, and profit share |
| Commission structure | Negotiated agent splits (commonly ~70/30 to 85/15); no franchise fee | ~70/30 split to an annual cap (varies by market), then 100%; profit share |
| Technology | Industry-leading proprietary platform — Compass CRM, Insights, marketing tools | Command CRM and the KW app |
| Luxury focus | Strong luxury footprint in most top metros | KW Luxury division |
| Best for | Agents who want best-in-class technology and a premium brand in major markets | Agents who value training, the cap model, and profit-share income |
Brokerage comparison
Compass vs Keller Williams
An honest side-by-side for agents deciding where to hang their license — model, commission, technology and luxury focus. Terms are negotiated and vary by market; use this as a starting point.
Compass
Agents who want best-in-class technology and a premium brand in major markets.
Keller Williams
Agents who value training, the cap model, and profit-share income.
Choose Compass if you want agents who want best-in-class technology and a premium brand in major markets. Its model — tech-forward traditional brokerage — and industry-leading proprietary platform — compass crm, insights, marketing tools tend to suit that agent.
Choose Keller Williams if you want agents who value training, the cap model, and profit-share income. The right answer usually comes down to the specific local office: the manager, the split you can negotiate, the team you'd join, and the brand's strength in your market.