Statistics · 2026 · ETFs

Healthcare ETF Statistics (2026)

XBI was the best-performing health care ETF over the past year, returning 54.5% with dividends reinvested, as of October 2, 2026. IYH returned 21.2%. The S&P 500 fund SPY returned 16.7%. Each return runs from a month-end close to the October 2, 2026 price and is annualized over the actual days: the one-year figure covers September 30, 2025 to October 2, 2026, so it will not match an issuer's month-end one-year return. Biotech funds and broad health care funds behaved like two different products on risk, so the choice depends on which one you want.

Key takeaways

Which health care ETFs performed best?

XBI led the group over one year at 54.5% with dividends reinvested, and IBB followed at 42.2%. Over five years the order changed: XLV ranked first at 7.2% a year, and XBI ranked last at 4.3%. The one-year leader is not the five-year leader, so recent leadership does not carry back through the longer record.

1. One-year gap: 33.3 percentage points

XBI returned 54.5% over the past year and IYH returned 21.2% (WealthyBud data · 6 health care funds, total return · October 2, 2026). All 6 funds have 121 month-end prices, so none is excluded from the multi-year comparisons below.

2. XBI led the three-year run at 28.5% a year

XBI compounded at 28.5% a year over three years, ahead of IBB at 19.1%. IYH came last at 10.5%, a spread of 18.0 points (WealthyBud data · 3-yr annualized total return · October 2, 2026).

3. Five-year spread: 2.9 points a year

XLV returned 7.2% a year and XBI returned 4.3% a year. The 4 broad funds sit within 1.1 points of each other (6.1% to 7.2%) (WealthyBud data · 5-yr annualized total return · October 2, 2026).

4. BLS expects healthcare jobs to grow much faster than average

The Bureau of Labor Statistics says overall employment in healthcare occupations is projected to grow much faster than the average for all occupations from 2025 to 2035, with about 1.9 million openings a year on average, per the BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook. That is a demand backdrop, not a forecast for fund returns.

The 6 health care ETFs and the S&P 500 benchmark, total returns with dividends reinvested, as of October 2, 2026
TickerFundExpense ratio1-yr total return5-yr total return (ann.)Volatility (ann.)Trailing yield
FHLCFidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF0.084%22.0%6.1%14.7%1.26%
IBBiShares Biotechnology ETF0.44%42.2%5.2%18.8%0.17%
IYHiShares U.S. Healthcare ETF0.37%21.2%6.2%14.7%1.13%
VHTVanguard Health Care ETF0.09%22.0%6.3%14.7%1.48%
XBIState Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF0.35%54.5%4.3%26.0%0.35%
XLVState Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF0.08%21.3%7.2%14.8%1.53%
SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust0.0945%16.7%13.9%15.7%0.99%

How much do health care ETFs cost?

Expense ratios range from 0.08% for XLV to 0.44% for IBB, with a median of 0.22%. On $10,000 that is $8 to $44 a year. The S&P 500 fund SPY charges 0.0945%. The biotech funds’ median ratio is 0.395% against 0.087% for the broad funds.

5. XLV costs 0.08% and IBB costs 0.44%

The cheapest health care fund is XLV, followed by FHLC at 0.084% and VHT at 0.09%. The most expensive is IBB, a 5.5-fold difference (WealthyBud data · issuer-verified expense ratios · October 2, 2026).

6. State Street lists a 0.08% gross expense ratio for XLV

The fund page says the gross expense ratio is 0.08%, meaning before any fee waivers, and lists $42.73 billion in assets as of October 1, 2026, per the State Street XLV page. XBI holds $10.08 billion per its page, and IBB holds $10.87 billion per its iShares page.

ETF hub

Compare major ETFs by fees and returns

Open the ETF hub

How volatile are health care ETFs?

XBI was the most volatile health care fund, with annualized volatility of 26.0%, against 14.7% for IYH, VHT, and FHLC (tied). XBI had the deepest drawdown at 56.7%, and VHT the shallowest at 15.2% (month-end prices; lows within a month are not captured). Volatility measures monthly swings; drawdown measures the worst fall.

7. XBI swung most: 26.0% annualized

XBI had the highest volatility, followed by IBB at 18.8%. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of the last 60 complete monthly returns through September 30, 2026 (WealthyBud data · annualized volatility · October 2, 2026).

8. IYH, VHT, and FHLC tied for least volatile at 14.7%

IYH, VHT, and FHLC tied as the least volatile funds, all at 14.7% to one decimal. The 4 broad funds range from 14.7% to 14.8%, so the spread among them is 0.1 points (WealthyBud data · annualized volatility · October 2, 2026).

9. XBI fell 56.7% peak to trough

XBI had the deepest drawdown, IBB next at 33.6%. The broad funds' falls ranged from 15.2% to 16.3%. Drawdown uses 121 month-end prices from September 30, 2016 to September 30, 2026 plus the October 2, 2026 price; lows within a month are not captured and the dataset does not record when each low occurred. (WealthyBud data · max drawdown · October 2, 2026)

How do health care ETFs compare with the S&P 500?

Over five years, 0 of 6 health care funds beat the S&P 500 fund SPY, which returned 13.9% a year. Over one year 6 beat it, and over three years 1 did. Over ten years 0 did. Results change with the window measured.

10. 0 of 6 funds beat the S&P 500 over five years

SPY returned 13.9% a year. The best health care fund, XLV, returned 7.2%, a gap of 6.7 points. The widest gap was 9.6 points (WealthyBud data · 5-yr annualized total return vs SPY · October 2, 2026).

11. 6 of 6 beat the index over one year, 1 over three

SPY returned 16.7% over one year and 23.1% a year over three. XBI, IBB, FHLC, VHT, XLV, and IYH beat it over one year (WealthyBud data · 1- and 3-yr total return vs SPY · October 2, 2026).

12. Ten-year record: XLV and VHT tied at 10.5% a year vs 15.3% for SPY

Over ten years, 0 of 6 health care funds beat the index. XLV and VHT tied for the best at 10.5% a year (to one decimal) and IBB the weakest at 8.1% (WealthyBud data · 10-yr annualized total return; all funds have 121 month-end prices · October 2, 2026).

13. 4 of 6 funds were less volatile than the index

SPY measured 15.7%. XLV, IYH, VHT, and FHLC came in below it, and 2 of 6 funds fell further than 23.9% in drawdown (month-end prices; lows within a month are not captured) (WealthyBud data · volatility and drawdown vs SPY · October 2, 2026).

How do biotech ETFs compare with broad health care ETFs?

The 2 biotech funds had median volatility of 22.4%, 1.5 times the 14.7% of the 4 broad funds. Their median worst drawdown was 45.1% versus 15.5% (month-end prices; lows within a month are not captured). Over one year biotech returned a median 48.4%, ahead of the broad funds’ 21.6%. Five-year returns were 4.7% and 6.3%.

14. Biotech was 1.5 times as volatile as broad health care

XBI and IBB had volatility of 26.0% and 18.8%; XLV, VHT, IYH and FHLC sat between 14.7% and 14.8% (WealthyBud data · medians by fund type · October 2, 2026).

15. Biotech drawdowns were 2.9 times as deep

XBI fell 56.7% at its worst and IBB fell 33.6% (month-end prices; lows within a month are not captured). The broad funds' median fall was 15.5% (WealthyBud data · max drawdown, medians by fund type · October 2, 2026).

16. Median biotech return was 48.4% over one year versus 21.6% for broad funds

Median one-year returns were 48.4% for biotech and 21.6% for broad funds; three-year 23.8% and 11.1% a year; five-year 4.7% and 6.3% a year (WealthyBud data · medians by fund type, dividends reinvested · October 2, 2026). Two funds per group is a small sample, so read these as descriptions, not rules.

17. FDA's drug center approved 46 novel drugs in 2025 and 50 in 2024

The FDA says CDER approved 46 new drugs never before approved or marketed in the U.S. in 2025, per its 2025 novel approvals page, and 50 in 2024, per its 2024 page. Approvals are one input for biotech companies, and XBI tracks a modified equal-weighted index of them, per its State Street page.

Median biotech versus median broad health care ETF, as of October 2, 2026 (returns annualized for 3 and 5 years, dividends reinvested; drawdown uses month-end prices, so lows within a month are not captured)
GroupExpense ratio1-yr return3-yr return (ann.)5-yr return (ann.)VolatilityWorst drawdown (month-end)
Biotech (IBB and XBI)0.395%48.4%23.8%4.7%22.4%45.1%
Broad health care (FHLC, IYH, VHT, and XLV)0.087%21.6%11.1%6.3%14.7%15.5%

What do health care ETFs pay?

XLV paid the highest trailing yield at 1.53%, and IBB paid the lowest at 0.17%. The S&P 500 fund SPY yielded 0.99%. Trailing yield divides the last 12 months of dividends by the current price. The 2 biotech funds paid a median 0.26%, against 1.37% for the 4 broad funds.

18. XLV yields 1.53%; IBB yields 0.17%

A $10,000 position in XLV paid about $153 over the last 12 months, against about $17 for IBB (WealthyBud data · trailing-12-month distributions · October 2, 2026).

19. Broad funds paid a median 1.37%, biotech 0.26%

4 of 6 funds out-yield SPY at 0.99%: XLV, VHT, FHLC, and IYH (WealthyBud data · trailing yield vs SPY · October 2, 2026).

What this means for investors

Pick broad or biotech first, then compare fees. The 4 broad funds returned similar amounts and carried similar risk, so a cheaper fund such as XLV at 0.08% saves money without changing the exposure. Biotech is a separate bet with 1.5 times the volatility.

Size biotech for the drop. XBI fell 56.7% at its worst (month-end prices; lows within a month are not captured). Hold only the amount you can leave alone through a fall of that size.

Check your overlap. XLV is also one of the funds covered in our sector ETF statistics, and many S&P 500 funds already hold health care. For company-level data, see health care stock statistics.

Past returns are not forecasts. Leadership rotates, and the figures above describe history only.

More ETFs statistics

Frequently asked questions

Which health care ETF performed best over the past year?
XBI returned 54.5% over the past year with dividends reinvested, as of October 2, 2026, followed by IBB at 42.2%. IYH ranked last at 21.2%. For comparison, the S&P 500 fund SPY returned 16.7% over that same one-year period, the benchmark for every comparison here.
What is the cheapest health care ETF?
XLV is the cheapest of the 6 funds compared, with an expense ratio of 0.08%, or $8 a year per $10,000 invested. FHLC follows at 0.084%. IBB is the most expensive at 0.44%. Check the issuer’s page for the current figure before you buy.
What is the difference between XLV and VHT?
Both hold broad U.S. health care stocks but track different indexes. XLV costs 0.08% and VHT costs 0.09%. Over five years XLV returned 7.2% a year and VHT returned 6.3%. Their volatility was 14.8% and 14.7%, so the ride was nearly the same.
Are biotech ETFs riskier than broad health care ETFs?
In this data, yes. The two biotech funds had median volatility of 22.4% against 14.7% for the 4 broad funds. Their median worst drawdown was 45.1% against 15.5% (month-end prices; lows within a month are not captured). Biotech also returned more over one year, but the swings are larger in both directions.
Do health care ETFs beat the S&P 500?
It depends on the window. Over five years, 0 of 6 health care funds beat SPY's 13.9% annual return, and over ten years 0 did. Over one year 6 beat it, and over three years 1 did. Results change with the window, so recent leadership says little about the next period.
Do health care ETFs pay dividends?
Yes, but modestly. Trailing yields run from 0.17% for IBB to 1.53% for XLV, against 0.99% for SPY. Trailing yield divides the last 12 months of dividends by the current price, and it does not guarantee that future payments will match it.
Figures on this page combine WealthyBud’s own datasets (as of October 2, 2026; returns run from month-end closes to the October 2, 2026 price, annualized over actual days) with cited public sources, as noted per statistic. This is a demonstration research page, not investment advice.

Harlan Petrov ETF Analyst

Harlan Petrov is an ETF analyst who covers broad-market and sector ETFs, focusing on expense ratios, tracking error and holdings concentration. He builds his comparisons from public fund prospectuses and holdings disclosures.