Statistics · 2026 · ETFs

ETF Statistics (2026)

The 28 ETFs WealthyBud tracks carry expense ratios from 0.03% to 0.49% and a median 1-year return of 16.6%, as of 2026-07-10. For scale, the U.S. ETF industry as a whole held $13.4 trillion in net assets across 4,495 funds at year-end 2025, per the Investment Company Institute — and pulled in a record $1.50 trillion in net inflows over the year, per ETFGI. SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) led WealthyBud’s tracked funds with a 110.5% 1-year return.

Key takeaways

How many ETFs does WealthyBud track, and how big is the U.S. ETF industry?

WealthyBud tracks 28 ETFs across 7 issuers, as of 2026-07-10. The broader U.S. ETF industry held $13.4 trillion in net assets across 4,495 funds at year-end 2025, per the Investment Company Institute, and equaled 30% of all U.S. investment-company assets.

1. WealthyBud tracks 28 ETFs

WealthyBud’s fund dataset covers 28 exchange-traded funds across 22 categories — broad index, sector, bond, dividend and commodity funds — as of 2026-07-10 (WealthyBud data · 28 ETFs).

2. U.S. ETF industry net assets: $13.4 trillion across 4,495 funds (year-end 2025)

The U.S. ETF market remained the largest in the world at year-end 2025, holding $13.4 trillion in total net assets across 4,495 funds — 70% of the $19.2 trillion in ETF net assets worldwide, per the Investment Company Institute’s 2026 Investment Company Fact Book.

3. ETFs equal 30% of U.S. investment-company assets

Total net assets in ETFs accounted for 30% of assets managed by U.S. investment companies at year-end 2025, per the same ICI Fact Book, up from a low single-digit share two decades ago.

4. Large-cap domestic equity ETFs hold $5.0 trillion, or 38% of industry net assets

Large-cap U.S. equity ETFs made up $5.0 trillion of the $13.4 trillion U.S. ETF market at year-end 2025, while bond ETFs held $2.2 trillion (17%), per the ICI Fact Book — the two largest slices of the industry.

What do ETF expense ratios look like?

Expense ratios across WealthyBud’s 28 tracked ETFs range from 0.03% to 0.49%, with a median of 0.09% and a mean of 0.14%. 6 funds tie for the cheapest, spanning both broad stock-index and core bond-index funds.

5. Cheapest expense ratio: 0.03%, tied across 6 funds

AGG, BND, IVV, VEA, VOO, VTI all charge 0.03% — the lowest expense ratio among WealthyBud’s 28 tracked ETFs, as of 2026-07-10 (WealthyBud data).

6. Priciest expense ratio: 0.49% (HYG)

HYG (iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF), a High-yield bonds fund, carries the highest expense ratio WealthyBud tracks at 0.49% as of 2026-07-10 (WealthyBud data).

7. Median expense ratio: 0.09%

Half of the 28 tracked ETFs charge 0.09% or less; the mean is higher, at 0.14%, because a handful of pricier sector and bond funds pull the average up (WealthyBud data · 28 ETFs).

ETFs tied for the lowest expense ratio WealthyBud tracks, 2026-07-10
TickerFundCategoryExpense ratio
AGGiShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETFUS total bond0.03%
BNDVanguard Total Bond Market ETFUS total bond0.03%
IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETFUS large-cap blend0.03%
VEAVanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETFDeveloped intl0.03%
VOOVanguard S&P 500 ETFUS large-cap blend0.03%
VTIVanguard Total Stock Market ETFUS total market0.03%

Which ETFs have had the best and worst returns?

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) posted the best 1-year return among WealthyBud’s tracked ETFs, at 110.5%, while TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) posted the worst, at -2.5% — a 112.9% spread. The median 1-year return across all 28 funds is 16.6%.

8. Best 1-year return: SMH at 110.5%

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF), a Semiconductors fund, returned 110.5% over the trailing year as of 2026-07-10 — the top performer among WealthyBud’s 28 tracked ETFs (WealthyBud data).

9. Worst 1-year return: TLT at -2.5%

TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF), a Long-term Treasuries fund, returned -2.5% over the trailing year as of 2026-07-10 — the weakest of the 28 tracked funds (WealthyBud data).

10. 1-year return spread: 112.9% between best and worst

The gap between SMH and TLT is 112.9%, showing how much 1-year performance diverges across category — semiconductors versus long-term Treasuries (WealthyBud data · 2026-07-10).

11. Median 1-year return: 16.6%

Across all 28 tracked ETFs, the median 1-year return is 16.6%, the 3-year median (annualized) is 15.0%, and the 5-year median (annualized) is 7.0% (WealthyBud data · 28 ETFs).

12. 6 of 28 tracked ETFs posted a negative 1-year return

6 funds — TLT, LQD, HYG, BND, AGG, JEPI — lost value over the trailing year, and every one is a bond or income fund, reflecting a tough stretch for fixed income (WealthyBud data · 2026-07-10).

Top 5 tracked ETFs by 1-year return, 2026-07-10
TickerFundCategory1-yr returnExpense ratio
SMHVanEck Semiconductor ETFSemiconductors110.5%0.35%
XLKTechnology Select Sector SPDRUS technology41.6%0.09%
QQQInvesco QQQ TrustUS large-cap growth27.2%0.20%
IWMiShares Russell 2000 ETFUS small-cap blend25.9%0.19%
XLEEnergy Select Sector SPDRUS energy21.9%0.09%
Flagship tool

Compare expense ratios and returns across every ETF WealthyBud tracks

Open the ETF hub

Which issuers dominate the ETF market?

Vanguard, State Street and BlackRock issue 24 of the 28 ETFs WealthyBud tracks (85.7%), out of 7 issuers total. Nationally, ETFGI reports the same three firms hold 72.1% of the entire $13.43 trillion U.S. ETF industry.

13. Vanguard, State Street and BlackRock issue 85.7% of tracked funds

24 of the 28 ETFs WealthyBud tracks come from Vanguard, State Street or BlackRock; the remaining 4 come from 4 smaller issuers (WealthyBud data · 28 ETFs).

14. Nationally, the top 3 U.S. ETF issuers hold 72.1% of industry assets

iShares (29.7% share), Vanguard (28.7%) and State Street SPDR (13.7%) together held 72.1% of the $13.43 trillion U.S. ETF industry at year-end 2025, among 460 total providers, per ETFGI’s year-end 2025 report, published January 19, 2026.

How volatile are the ETFs WealthyBud tracks?

BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) is the least volatile ETF WealthyBud tracks, with annualized volatility near 6.3%, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is the most volatile at 34.0%. The median across all 28 funds is 15.9%.

15. Least volatile: BND at 6.3%

BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF), a US total bond fund, has the lowest annualized volatility WealthyBud tracks, 6.3%, measured from monthly price moves (WealthyBud data · 2026-07-10).

16. Most volatile: SMH at 34.0%

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF), a Semiconductors fund, has the highest annualized volatility in the dataset, 34.0% — more than 5 times BND’s (WealthyBud data · 2026-07-10).

17. Median volatility: 15.9%

Across all 28 tracked ETFs, annualized volatility has a median of 15.9%, with bond funds clustering near the bottom and single-sector equity funds like semiconductors near the top (WealthyBud data · 28 ETFs).

What this means for ETF investors

Scale keeps compounding. A $13.4 trillion industry pulling in a record $1.50 trillion in a single year means ETFs are no longer a niche wrapper — they equal nearly a third of all U.S. investment-company assets, per the ICI and ETFGI.

Cost still separates funds more than skill. WealthyBud’s 0.09% median expense ratio versus a 0.49% high shows most fee dispersion comes from a small group of niche funds, not the broad index core.

A single year of returns is noisy. SMH’s 110.5% run and TLT’s -2.5% slide are both category-driven, not issuer-driven — semiconductors had a strong year and long-duration bonds did not.

Concentration cuts both ways. Three issuers control roughly 86% of WealthyBud’s tracked funds and 72.1% of the national market — scale keeps costs low, but most investors’ ETF exposure runs through a handful of firms.

Frequently asked questions

How many ETFs does WealthyBud track?
WealthyBud tracks 28 ETFs across 7 issuers and multiple fund categories — broad index, sector, bond, dividend and commodity funds — with expense ratios and returns as of 2026-07-10.
What is the average ETF expense ratio?
Among the 28 ETFs WealthyBud tracks, the median expense ratio is 0.09% and the mean is 0.14%, ranging from 0.03% to 0.49%, as of 2026-07-10.
Which ETF had the best 1-year return?
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) had the best 1-year return among WealthyBud's tracked ETFs, at 110.5% as of 2026-07-10, a Semiconductors fund.
Which ETF had the worst 1-year return?
TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) had the worst 1-year return among WealthyBud's tracked ETFs, at -2.5% as of 2026-07-10 — all 6 funds with a negative 1-year return are bond or income funds.
How big is the U.S. ETF industry?
The U.S. ETF market held $13.4 trillion in total net assets across 4,495 funds at year-end 2025 — 70% of the $19.2 trillion in ETF assets worldwide — according to the Investment Company Institute's 2026 Investment Company Fact Book.
How much money flowed into U.S. ETFs in 2025?
U.S. ETFs took in a record $1.50 trillion in net inflows in 2025, pushing industry assets to $13.43 trillion by year-end, according to ETFGI's January 2026 report — the largest annual inflow on record.
Which companies issue the most ETFs?
Vanguard, State Street and BlackRock issue the majority of large, widely held ETFs. In WealthyBud's 28-fund dataset they account for 24 funds (85.7%); nationally, iShares, Vanguard and State Street SPDR together hold 72.1% of U.S. ETF industry assets, per ETFGI.
What is the cheapest ETF expense ratio in WealthyBud's dataset?
Six ETFs tie for the lowest expense ratio WealthyBud tracks, 0.03%: the stock-index funds VOO, IVV and VTI, plus the bond-index funds AGG and BND and the international fund VEA. The priciest, HYG, charges 0.49%.
Figures on this page combine WealthyBud’s own ETF dataset with cited public industry sources current as of 2026-07-10 or later, as noted per statistic. Fund facts are compiled from public disclosures; returns are computed from delayed price history and are illustrative. Past performance does not predict future results. This is a demonstration research page, not investment advice.

Harlan Petrov ETF Analyst

Harlan Petrov is an ETF analyst who covers broad-market and sector ETFs, focusing on expense ratios, tracking error and holdings concentration. He builds his comparisons from public fund prospectuses and holdings disclosures.